Haley backers’ spending surges in Republican’s last-ditch White House bid

Haley backers’ spending surges in Republican’s last-ditch White House bid

© Reuters. Journalists in the press room watch as Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley speaks during the fourth Republican candidates’ debate of the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign hosted by NewsNation at the

By Jason Lange, Alexandra Ulmer and Gram Slattery

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican Nikki Haley’s deep-pocketed allies have turbo-charged spending on her presidential bid in recent weeks, a last-ditch effort to boost her chances against frontrunner Donald Trump in party nomination contests that start next month.

The SFA Fund Inc, a pro-Haley super PAC funded by business titans including former WhatsApp CEO Jan Koum, has spent over $21 million on ads and mailings backing her White House run in the nearly three months since her breakout performance in a Sept. 27 Republican debate, according to a Reuters analysis of its financial disclosures to the Federal Election Commission.

The spending was higher than that of any other super PAC during the period and a major increase from the $14 million that SFA Fund spent backing Haley, a former South Carolina governor who served as U.N. ambassador under Trump, in the three months before the debate.

In both periods, SFA Fund’s outlays have been more than double the reported spending by the biggest pro-Trump super PAC, which is known as MAGA Inc. Super PACs are allowed to raise and spend unlimited sums supporting candidates but are not allowed to coordinate activity with the candidates they back.

The wave of pro-Haley spending is a sign of resistance from wealthy donors to what many – including top party officials – see as Trump’s inevitable clinching of the Republican nomination to face incumbent President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in the Nov. 5 2024 presidential election.

“What remains to be seen – and what GOP elected officials seem skeptical about – is whether that extra money will win her any primaries against Trump, let alone the nomination,” said Michael Robinson Byrd, a professional Republican fundraiser who is unaffiliated in the 2024 presidential election.

The pro-Haley spending is overwhelmingly concentrated in Iowa and New Hampshire, which hold the first two Republican nomination contests in January, said Mark Harris, the SFA Fund’s chief strategist.

“We’re going to continue to spend heavily in those states,” Harris said.

KOCH SUPPORT

Another pro-Haley super PAC known as AFP Action, which is affiliated with billionaire Charles Koch, has spent more than $11 million since the debate. That spending has largely been on ads attacking Trump and Democratic incumbent Joe Biden but recently it has spent heavily on digital ads supporting Haley.

Haley’s poll numbers have risen throughout the spending surge and her solid performances in Republican debates, including the Sept. 27 event when she delivered aggressive but nuanced answers on healthcare, education and relations with China.

But Trump still dominates the contest.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday showed Haley and another Republican hopeful, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, tied for second place with 11% of Republican support each. Trump, who has skipped the Republican candidates’ debates, towered above them with 61%.

The SFA Fund has so far reported raising nearly $19 million in the first half of this year, with most of the money coming from a handful of business executives. It isn’t due to report more recent fundraising until January but has filed dozens of reports on expenditures.

The Trump and Haley campaigns have so far reported numbers to the Federal Election Commission on spending and fundraising through the third quarter of this year, when Trump spent $9.5 million and Haley $3.5 million.

U.S. venture capitalist Tim Draper told Reuters on Thursday he had donated $1 million to the pro-Haley SFA Fund, bringing his total contributions to some $2.25 million. Draper added he would be hosting a fundraiser for Haley in February, with a Democrat, whom he declined to name, as co-host.

‘IT DOESN’T MATTER’

MAGA Inc, the main pro-Trump super PAC which started the year with $54 million in the bank, has focused much of its spending attacking DeSantis, the Florida Republican candidate, rather than Haley, despite her recent rise in opinion polls.

Karoline Leavitt, spokeswoman for MAGA Inc, acknowledged that the pro-Haley effort was “raking in money” but dismissed her chances of upsetting Trump. “It doesn’t matter how much she raises,” Leavitt said.

Many of the SFA Fund’s ads have focused on Haley’s pledges to support Israel and confront China. The ads sometimes take swipes at DeSantis but have not directly criticized Trump.

AFP Action’s ads, however, tell voters Trump will lose to Biden by turning off independents and supercharging Democrats. The group, part of a network of Koch-controlled groups that is one of America’s most influential conservative organizations, endorsed Haley on Nov. 28.

Since then it has spent more than $4 million on digital ads and efforts to canvass voters in the early-voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as well as in Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia, said Americans for Prosperity spokesperson Sydney Stubbs.

(This story has been corrected to fix typographical errors in paragraphs 7, 18, 20, 22)

Our Apps



Terms And Conditions
Privacy Policy
Risk Warning
Do not sell my personal information

© 2007-2023 Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.